Background
This analysis is based on an older version of our inference model which is accurate but more difficult to read

Question

Was Seth Rich a WikiLeaks source (in the DNC email leak)?

09 Oct, 2016

Scenariosinfo icon

Calculated Conclusionsinfo icon

Conclusionsinfo icon

1

91%
Not DNC; not source:
The DNC did not arrange Seth Rich's murder; he was not a WikiLeaks source (in the DNC email leak).
91%

2

8%
Not DNC; source:
The DNC did not arrange Seth Rich's murder; he was a WikiLeaks source (in the DNC email leak).
8%

3

0.9%
DNC; source:
The DNC arranged Seth Rich's murder; he was a WikiLeaks source (in the DNC email leak).
0.9%

4

0.2%
DNC; not source:
The DNC arranged Seth Rich's murder; he was not a WikiLeaks source (in the DNC email leak).
0.2%
Implied plausibility
info icon
Likelihoods based only on other elements of the analysis, not considering evidence of this sub-topic.
Not DNC; not source
98%
Not DNC; source
1.6%
DNC; source
0.2%
DNC; not source
0.2%
Compatibility with evidence
info icon
Likelihoods based only on evidence of this sub-topic, assuming all hypotheses equally plausible.
Not DNC; not source
91%
Not DNC; source
8%
DNC; source
0.9%
DNC; not source
0.2%
Conclusion
info icon
Final likelihoods, combining plausibility and evidence.
Not DNC; not source
91%
Not DNC; source
8%
DNC; source
0.9%
DNC; not source
0.2%

Analysis

Information provided by WikiLeaks (1 item)

Julian Assange mentioned Rich's unsolved murder in an interview with Dutch television, saying that his sources take major risks, and that they are concerned when events like these happen. Shortly after the interview, WikiLeaks announced a $20,000 reward for information leading to a conviction for the murder of Seth Rich.

Assange mentions Rich in an interview with Nieuwshuur (published 9 August 2016)
Not DNC; not source
12%
Not DNC; source
38%
DNC; source
38%
DNC; not source
12%
Not DNC; not source
12%
Not DNC; source
38%
DNC; source
38%
DNC; not source
12%

Other possible sources (2 items)

A source at the DNC claims that the email leak was a remote attack from the Russian government, and that there is no indication that an insider was involved.
Sources: Newsweek
Not DNC; not source
28%
Not DNC; source
21%
DNC; source
24%
DNC; not source
28%
Not DNC; not source
28%
Not DNC; source
21%
DNC; source
24%
DNC; not source
28%
The hacker Guccifer 2.0 claims to be responsible for the leak. 
Sources: Motherboard
Guccifer 2.0
Guccifer 2.0
twitter.com
Not DNC; not source
33%
Not DNC; source
17%
DNC; source
17%
DNC; not source
33%
Not DNC; not source
33%
Not DNC; source
17%
DNC; source
17%
DNC; not source
33%

Evidence (2 items)

Craig Murray, a former British diplomat associated with WikiLeaks, said that the emails were leaked by American citizens with legal access to the information, and that he received the materials via an intermediary in a meeting in Washington D.C.

Sources: Daily Mail
Craig Murray, an associate of Julian Assange
Craig Murray, an associate of Julian Assange
www.globalresearch.ca
Not DNC; not source
10%
Not DNC; source
40%
DNC; source
40%
DNC; not source
10%
Not DNC; not source
10%
Not DNC; source
40%
DNC; source
40%
DNC; not source
10%

An anonymous federal investigator who reviewed an FBI forensic report detailing the contents of Rich's computer says that there is evidence on the computer that shows that Rich sent thousands of DNC emails to Gavin MacFadyen, a journalist who was the director of WikiLeaks.

Sources: Fox News (later retracted)
MacFadyen and Assange in 2011
MacFadyen and Assange in 2011
www.nytimes.com
Not DNC; not source
24%
Not DNC; source
26%
DNC; source
26%
DNC; not source
24%
Not DNC; not source
24%
Not DNC; source
26%
DNC; source
26%
DNC; not source
24%

Discussioninfo icon

This topic is part of a broader analysis. To view the discussion page of the main analysis, click below:
userIcon